KNOWLEDGE OF ARCHAEOLOGY THOUGHT
Archaeology of the future has been developed by some utopian thinkers and fiction writers making approaches or archetypes of possible social scenarios beyond the life of the author is therefore building models of any kind may be capricious, but largely on the basis of reality based on the technical and social conditions in which it operates builder projects are usually not very accurate for a thousand causes of contingency against which it is subjected proposed speech. "Easier said than done long way", more however, the project can not be avoided, as is the archeology of the future, so that part of the idealization of a behavioral model that still does not prove their steadfastness to the corrosion of time.
investigate the contents of the trash that accumulated at the end of the day, the archaeologist can infer about the customs prevailing at least in food and other vital issues that were prevailing on such a day, is the archeology of the present also reflected in the speeches most commonly used on certain days of this, plus other artifacts relating to the current fashion, provides a view of the Archaeologists in reference to the "new" in relation to the past, ie the comparative study becomes imminent due to the uncertainty of characterizing the past.
A cause is the presence of archaeological activity associated with the study of great civilizations past has seen fit to place this branch of science as regards the study of past knowledge, but rather a helper from historians or history is investigated only by archaeologists rather romantic spirit to entertain the audience with old issues for public entertainment eager to discover ancient mysteries, this is the case research on the mummies of the powerful personalities remote Nile civilization, emphasizing further studies on the classical Helena
Archies = In ancient Greek ancient arche = beginning and arch = denotes primacy, first begin command. File = beginning, origin.
Architecture = Arche model "Techos = worker, workers Ura = infinitive amount. Archaeology Arche Logos = principle = group, collection, classification, treated.
arquismo In is associated with the idea of \u200b\u200bthe original model, the upper end representative in its application to past, present and future, is seeking to determine the symbolic features representative of a dominant model of aesthetic vision reflected the spirit of a time limited periods arbitrarily defined time perhaps but ultimately is the result of the construction of certain structures that single forms to consider and respond to the world by groups of men whose actions make up a mode of production and therefore specific modes of government power, religious and architectural course. The latter is the handiest for the investigation of the original models for least seniority in the absence of conventional writing, in our times we are able to understand, but once reached the stage of written culture archeology tends to be more accurate to define the original models as opposed to historiography that relies on archaeological activities to describe human actions, according to clearances whimsical pieces of time-space adjusted world view that dominates the thinking of historians on its own present. Thus we have the dual-History Archaeology.
thinking understood as a vital intangible complex itself can only be considered based on their unique Product: Knowledge.
"Weighing" Sorrow is felt in the head in a situation that causes us pain, grief for Hispanics translates to "think", "Think" for whites and each culture has its phonetic reference in this regard. not therefore cease to be a complex life in the "intellectuals" of our time have to call "complex thinking", as if that was not a resort complex in itself, but that thought is complex, which comprises a absurd tautology.
Addressing archeology of this complex life without resorting to the method "positivist" quantification as does "science" only leads contemporary prisoners continue indefinitely in the tyranny of numbers. Archeology provides clues not positive, but significant models that make up the entity I call "vital complex" genesis of all knowledge. In this regard will describe the four components.
revolution of thought, which is embodied in the setting of great civilizations capable of being representative certain "times", but thought Revolution? Is it? For many thinkers alone and there is only the evolution of thought subjecting the revolution as an exceptional state in the context of responding to changing the composition of the memes that will be discussed further ahead.
The revolution of thought is the original model that makes up the essence of it, the less intense pace of the revolution is nominated as a gradual evolution but this contextualized in terms of revolution is that the continuing trend towards investment thinking that models are invested in other models that can be head in relation to what precedes it, if possible, but behave in the investment management before the revolution. Arche precisely the thinking is that the principle is the basis revolution as major archaeological course that puts your opponent: The counter revolution.
The counter is inherent in the same revolution as it is the counterweight causes involution of the evolutionary process, placed in the extreme "negative" or "positive" according to the taste of those who value such extremes. Although the counter while there is reduction of the revolution is dependent on the presence of the counter because it is not a principle or model is in the image of the revolution a kind of anti mirror image model of the figure of principle.
McLuhan in his four laws of media thinking as applied to artifact "soft" recognizes the investment process of the dominant models and extends the generalizability of the investment law the so-called revolution, but, based on investment is caused by excess pressure that receives a "medium" in this case thought. Notwithstanding the archeology of thought involved model of revolution as the creator of consistent models of the main model is revolution. Does not break the merit of Mc Luhan, contrary strengthens the principle of revolution surrounding the investment law that it extends to all media. That this law is derived from the behavior of all components including the nature and the thought is one thing, but quite another to be equated or matched with the unique dynamics of thought. However, the pressure to equalize through generalizations named "law" serves another archetype of thought :
original model equation is vital part of the complex component called thought which tends to establish balance between the environment and yourself, through language has coined a philosophical maxim that is considered "religious truth" that "we were made the image and likeness of God "a kind of investment now that nature is only based on the authority of man. Levy Strauss argues that "Man has always thought so" before this authority anthropology - can claim the cultural tendency to equate the phenomena at least in matters of universal laws. Man has always thought so, means it has always been the same in the action of thinking. The notion tissue or text is immutable in thought as is the case of the network where there are nodal points and peripheral branches, ie branches of a tree and its roots are linked to the node called trunk, see an illustrative biological equation equation applied to the principle of thought. The universal is the particular node and the ramifications that can be considered a way of dendrite.
The concept "reality" means in fact the offset of the order of things in motion and the state of our whims of what should be, so we resort to a reference in this state of sympathy than the state of harmony.
Being in harmony is to the liking of the balance between fact and thought, so the search for equality is fundamental point in the work of thought. Murders and wars are caused by inequality both modern social developments are in principle the demand for equality, the French Revolution of 1789 is based on the sense of equality rather than equality in the eyes of God sustained during since the medieval age is attached to the concept of liberalism based freedom characteristic of modernity. justice still valid in the investigation of which equals to men but also the reasons for the difference, hence the modern state to act by "the neutral" where "justice is blind." In order to "neuter" is the essence of the original model that has the thought, the equation. The logic is by far the evidence for this explanation.
pre logical thinking up the dream or the childhood of humanity which is characterized by the dominance of the realm of incoherence, of the absurd and the myths. The power of persuasion of logical thinking is the balance and equality between things real and abstract thinking. Balance operation is first developed in the arithmetic
In sum is equal archaeological model of thought that has sustained Unity in
cloning or replication as a model of thought generates structuring "templates" on which replicated the central images that thought is generated. "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness" Genesis 1:27 at least this is the version of the translators who have attempted to clone the divine word, but somehow it is useful to illustrate as thought "solidified" models or patterns can be outlined and played a similar way regardless of the number, reverence or fear of the clone is highlighted in the case of composing classical cultures such as the constellation of the twins, Romulus and Remus ... ... or the murder of a twin by certain cultures and their evil distinction. The mold is the ARCOS region that sustains good thought but the thought is not eternal linearity linearity even if this has some degree of longevity but not forever, making clones, a system that took up the modern mode of production where Cloning of articles or goods are cloned in factories called "iron", whose mission is to clone all potentially tradable schemes. Mass production is only the expression of the dominant contemporary archeology where the artificial world is composed of schemes cloned.
replication at the non-linearity exists as eternal force another archetype of thought is obvious:
But fractality is a product of the cloning of minimum units underlying structures of nature ie fractal bases with replication initiating cumulative stressing the plastic forms of the fractal nature of the archetype by for replication of the "reality" and is part of the neocortex of the brain systems that originally comes from of our aggression there reptiles, mammals hence our perceptions sentimental and finally the neocortex derived from monkeys which over the years reached the logical capacity reaching established the "humanization" of certain animal species. But precisely this replication has an impact from the aforementioned revolution which determines the sequence of archetypal images of thought. By Richard Dawkins called the name of "memes" These are in turn minimal units of information and cultural replication of fractals so that ideas, concepts, techniques, skills, habits that are likely to transform into other archetypes Product or social paradigms of chaotic connection strength under the revolutionary force and the force equation. Thus replication of cultural traits are indifferent to the "truth." We are themselves the product of immemorial family archetype of personalities Adam and Eve have archaeological been generating stereotypes associated with Homo Faber (ironmaster) iron was possibly the name before the land called by the Latins. The fractal of thought is the minimum unit "Nemis" of the chains that form structural instant speed (almost timeless) that are arming the virtual image: Idea.
Variables of these archetypes of thought is manifested in human species such as Homo Sapiens, Speaker Homos, Homo Faber, Homo Politikon, religiosus Homo, Homo Simbólicus, Homo Homo Eroticus and Aesthetic. Expression of the archeology of thought that have created the patterns recorded in the accounts historical archetypes appear before our contemporary witness to the difference between some types of man and others through the ages.
consider two possible archetypes are primarily known as passions essences "affections of the soul being that part of the body type of humor that his conduct to the social environment that surrounds it is more singular not unconscious, but is idiosyncratic body attitude as a major trend that former students of behavior nouns attributed to each of the attitudes of people classified by their characteristics such as greed, hatred, revenge, humility, pride, vanity, greed, envy, sloth, filial love, work, fraternal love, among other ways to recognize both types of behavior in natural inclinations expressed or express the interiority of the individual specific types of events. The question is whether these are inherent components of thought becoming a fundamental archetype.
Moreover another gap appears at least in response to the question whether thought is another archetype of private property. Case attributed by some thinkers eternal life, which is part of the archeology of thought and therefore private property shall be forever, for others it tax is a matter for private property has always existed, without confusing that man needs to live a living space, the condition of distribution of global land areas are constantly changing due to the impact of population explosion and economy monopolist is increasing, so the per capita space is reduced proportionally. The matter was raised there, but in the course of history we see a group of people to defend property and other communal property eligible for perhaps two kinds of thoughts are dominated by these two archetypes, or the central archetype is the property and its specification is operated by trends but of secondary importance, such So if we assume that the human species is predatory in nature or is a virus destroying the ecosystem of the land itself is the kind that signifies the end of the terrestrial biosphere. Understand self in this way, if possible to ensure that thought is also made up the archetype of ownership.
The journey to the center of thought is not over yet, but these views can explore some roads less traveled by modern rationalism that created the archetype of the positive reason without providing further information to shed light on the archeology thinking outside the canons here restated
Eduardo Nunez Becu
Monterrey Nuevo Leon, July 30, 2007
0 comments:
Post a Comment