REVIEW OF THE LAST TWO Recuperatorios EXAMS TAKEN THE FIRST PART EIGHTEEN OCTOBER 2010 .-
1. Mat. 19469. GB Student Unless the answer regarding the apparent partner and something of the invalid provisions of Article 13, the test is a very low level. The only made to seek review, demonstrates that it has no real awareness of what they should hear the matter. The answers are poor, sometimes non-existent. The student must make a far superior effort. Certainly no level, your failing grade to be confirmed. DOS (2) .-
2. Mat. 20212. Virtually DD student does not answer, for solution by reduction to a partner and member of a member in respect of exclusion does not expressly say things orderly and incomplete, some out of context and lacks many details, making several errors such as saying that excluded takes the real value of the contribution. With respect to art. 13 replies wildly, adding alleged provisions not covered by law, evidence in response that do not understand what was the question. Regarding the change of venue is more complete response is noted but did not understand that can only be decided by the board when not included in the statute. Regarding contributions, he says, does not mean answering what is asked. The same is true for mergers and divisions. Certainly no level, your failing grade to be confirmed. TWO (2) .-
0 comments:
Post a Comment